Score which climate risks actually threaten a health or access programme, across four dimensions, before you commit budget to fixing any of them. Free. No email required.
Download the .xlsxTwo tabs. An instructions sheet explaining the scoring logic, and a working tracker with four sample risk entries already scored so you can see the format in use. The tracker scores every risk on Likelihood x Severity (1 to 5 each), auto-calculates a priority tier, and summarises how many High, Medium and Low priority risks you're carrying.
Can people physically reach the service when climate stress hits, flooded roads, storm damage, seasonal isolation.
Does the cold chain, the drug supply, or the equipment stay intact under heat, power loss, or transport disruption.
Can staff safely work and travel during heat advisories, flooding, or other extreme weather days.
Does patient affordability or programme demand hold up after a climate shock hits the local economy.
This is a self-assessment starting point, not a full diagnostic. It's the same four dimensions our CAST engagement scores in depth, with external validation and a weighted methodology, across a complete climate-health year. Use this tracker to find out whether that fuller diagnostic is worth commissioning.
That's usually the signal a full CAST diagnostic will pay for itself.
Talk to Syntropy EarthFree self-assessment · under three minutes
Reading the standard is step one. Knowing your own exposure is step two.
CAVS-S turns the reporting question into your own numbers: a directional read on where climate is already reaching your physical reach, supply-chain integrity, workforce availability and demand continuity. Free, under three minutes, and the result names the data gaps your answers exposed.
Peer-benchmarked against FY2024-25 BRSR disclosures from 59 listed Indian companies.